Spin, Dick, spin!
Today has been a glorious news day for me. I am filled with merriment and mirth, and I will share my happiness with you. Let's get started!
First up we have a news item about how Donald Rumsfeld was bypassed - contrary to the apparent chain of command - by "Tricky" Dick Cheney when it came to giving the order to shoot down hijacked airplanes on 9-11. I love this excerpt from the conversation between the two men:
Cheney: "That is correct. And it's my understanding they've already taken a couple of the aircraft (hijacked airliners) out."
Oh, Dick. *shakes head sadly* Is that your understanding? This is just more proof, in addition to Monday's "SADDAM KNEW AL-QAEDA, NYAH!" outburst, that Dick Cheney knows absolutely nothing.
Moving on ... Maureen O'Dowd's column in today's NY Times, which compares Cheney to a malfunctioning robot who can't stop repeating the same old tired phrases. Stepford Wife, indeed. But now Bush himself is malfunctioning - he's come out to state, unequivocally, that the 9-11 Commission doesn't know what it's talking about when it says that there is no verifiable link between Saddam Hussein and al-Qaeda.
"This administration never said that the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated between Saddam and al Qaeda. We did say there were numerous contacts between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda," Bush said. "There were numerous contacts between the two."
If by numerous you mean ZERO. There is no evidence that Hussein ever met with anyone from al-Qaeda. There is only a tangential reference to one of his ministers meeting with an al-Qaeda representative in the Sudan. The al-Qaeda representative - I wonder if they're like Amway reps? - requested assistance from Iraq and was rebuffed.
So there's your big reason why the U.S. needed to invade Iraq. I'm only surprised that Bush hasn't come out to say that God wanted him to lead an invasion of Iraq and that since we have God on our side everything we do is okay. I'm sure that proclamation is coming, though.
Back to the NY Times and the case for war. Piggybacking on the whole "numerous contacts" between Iraq and al-Qaeda, the NY Times reveals the following:
And finally, the NY Times editorial board weighs in on the Iraq/al-Qaeda faux-connection:
This is not just a matter of the president's diminishing credibility, although that's disturbing enough. The war on terror has actually suffered as the conflict in Iraq has diverted military and intelligence resources from places like Afghanistan, where there could really be Qaeda forces, including Mr. bin Laden.
Who is this Dick Cheney guy you keep talking about?????
Posted by: TVJunkie at June 17, 2004 05:33 PM*sings*
Cheyn cheyn cheyn
Cheyn cheyn cheyn
Cheyn cheyn chey-iai-iai-iai yeah
Cheney the foooo-oooooool
HWG - You should do the play-by-play for the political beat. I swear, you capture all of the pertinent information and somehow add humor. Nicely done.
Posted by: Mensch71 at June 17, 2004 06:47 PMThanks, Mensch! Bush/Cheney give me so much to work with, it's really not that difficult. Those two are a veritable treasure trove of material.
Teem am funny.
Posted by: Highwaygirl at June 17, 2004 10:02 PM